Conflict is an ever-present characteristic and attribute in society. Disputes can emerge regarding variations of opinions and perspective. It can also appear on a personal extent between people. Frequently, we perceive that we have no options in conflict. Three sources used are Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat, Courage in Denmark: Resistance to the Nazi’s in WWII, and Conflict in Communities to support my topic. On a nation by nation basis, we discern whether we attack or choose to let prolong actions until necessary. However, there are situations that enable us to make the best decisions about how to respond to those situations. One of these principles people use to best respond to conflict is to use assertiveness.The assertive principles of standing up for oneself while acknowledging the rights of others means that both tactically and strategically the assertive person always has a win-win solution to conflict in their mind. For example, the text of Courage in Denmark: Resistance to the Nazis In WWII stated, “The Allied powers — including the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union — worked together to defeat the Axis powers, which consisted of Germany, Italy, and Japan. “. The main conflict that is presented in the text is joining a gathering which can cause quarreling but also connections. All individuals tend to support their own group and display hatred on other groups. However, being assertive includes some hazard since you aren’t ensured the result. You have a superior possibility of having your requirements met with assertive action than by being passive or not taking action. Assertive people have a solution to always be superior with wisdom and never force. They see the whole situation from both points of view. They aim for a resolution to solve problems based on wisdom, not force. In addition, conflict shows us that humans don’t always use common sense and we tend to look for the solution that we like for ourselves. The text portrays the statement, “I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men.” In this statement, Churchill wants to inform Parliament that a war cabinet has been formed in urgency, representing the unity of the nation to fight together. This highlights the fact of assertive people having confidence. To Churchill, the fact that he risks something to say his opinion shows his assertiveness, he’s risking a lot to assert what he believes in to show that it is worth it, this includes that it must mean something. However, beliefs can also cause debates and people selecting and supporting their own sides. Instead, this displays that our experienced responses to conflict create many people to believe that most of us are identical. It exhibits our ideas, thoughts, and beliefs are similar. If we use assertiveness, our needs, wants, and feelings are more likely to be understood. Both parties are more likely to feel respected and heard. However, we need to be willing to hear their opinions to understand what they’re trying to say. In addition, the relationship is strengthened by the exchange. Also, people can experience fewer negative conflicts and arguments with the better relationships made. This increases a better chance of having necessities met with assertive action than by being detached or forceful. For example, in the article, Conflicts in Communities it states, “Groups of people who share similar interests and attitudes produce feelings of community.” What’s more, they routinely segregate for supporting their own specific assembling, and expect that related assembling individuals will do in likewise for them. When communicating confidently, it’s a great idea to think ahead. Guarantee the outcome expected if the information wanted was relayed. To conclude, assertiveness bolsters your requirements and emotions. This incorporates how the two sides will more likely feel regarded and hear. The assertive standards of standing for oneself while recognizing the privileges of others. These three reasons all help that assertiveness is the most ideal approach to react to conflict.